PERNIKAHAN BUGIS-MELAYU DAN CIKAL BAKAL GELAR BARU KEBANGSAWANAN DI KERAJAAN JOHOR RIAU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33652/handep.v7i1.402Keywords:
ethnic identity, Bugis Malay, and Johor RiauAbstract
Internal conflict in the struggle for power within the Kingdom of Johor in the 18th century involved the Bugis people in the area. The Upu Daeng Brothers earned the Yang Dipertuan Muda (YDM) in the Kingdom of Johor, married Malay nobles and the sultan's sister after they successfully conquered Raja Kecik. Accordingly, these situations led to the disappearance of Bugis person’s identity. In other words, Bugis descent who marry Malays no longer bear the name Daeng but Raja. The study employed historical research methods applying heuristics, source criticism, interpretation, and historiography, in which the data analysis was from the perspective of the cultural identity approach. This research revealed that the Bugis descent who lived and settled in the Johor Riau Kingdom since the 18th century were known as Bugis Malays. The new identity was due to the title 'raja,' bestowed upon the Bugis who married the Malays. The use of the new title began with the involvement of Bugis descendants in government and marriages between Bugis and Malay aristocrats.References
Adil, Haji Buyong bin. 1980. Sejarah Johor. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Ahmad, A. Samad. 1985. Kerajaan Johor-Riau. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Ahmad, Jasni bin. 2016. “Bugis di Kedah 1600-1800: Suatu Tinjauan Awal.” Proceeding of ICECRS 1 (1):81-84.
Andaya, Leonard Y. 1995. “The Bugis Makassar Diasporas.” Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 68(1 (268):119-38.
Barnard, Timothy P. 1994. Raja Kecil dan Mitos Pengabsahannya. Pekanbaru: Pusat Pengkajian Melayu Universitas Islam Riau.
Dahlan, Ahmad. 2014. Sejarah Melayu. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Daud, Alwi. 2016.“Perkahwinan Aristokrat Bugis dan Melayu Abad ke 18: Kajian Berdasarkan Teks Silsilah Melayu dan Bugis, Hikayat Upu Daeng Menambun dan Hikayat Negeri Johor.” Makalah. Seminar Institusi Raja (Siraj IV) Hubungan Luar Kesultanan Melayu, Kuala Lumpur.
Erman, Erwiza. 2022. “The Karimata Strait: Heritage of Network System and Socio-Political History of Malay Sultanate.” Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heri tage 11(1):84-112.
Fahrudin, Ali. 2013. “Pusat Kajian Islam Melayu: Studi Peran Masjid Sultan Riau Masa Lalu.” Jurnal Lektur Keagamaan 11(2):405-28.
Fatimah, Raja, dan Adnan. n.d. “Gene alogy of Daeng Celak Yang Dipertuan Muda Riau III (3rd Vice roy of Riau).” Endangered Archives Programme. Diunduh 25 Juni, 2023 (https://eap.bl.uk/archive-file/ EAP153-4-4).
Hamid, Abd Rahman, dan Muhammad Saleh Madjid. 2015. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Hendraswati, J. Dalle, dan Zulfa Jamalie. 2017. Diaspora dan Ketahanan Budaya Orang Bugis di Pagatan Tanah Bumbu. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.
Hooker, Virginia Matheson. 1991. Tuhfat Al-Nafis : Sejarah Melayu Islam, Terj. Ahmad Fauzi Basri. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Ikhwan, Ikhwan. 2016. “Machiavelli: Pembenaran Kekerasan dalam Politik Kekuasaan.” AL-IJTIMA`I - International Journal of Govern ment and Social Science 2(1):101- 25.
Kadir, Daud. 2008. Sejarah Kesultanan Lingga-Riau. Lingga: Pemerintah Kabupaten Lingga.
Kuntowijoyo. 2013. Pengantar Ilmu Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Mansur, Raja Abdurrahman. 1983. “Silsilah Hubungan Raja-Raja Melayu/Bugis Johor Riau/Lingga dan Selangor.” Naskah tidak diterbitkan. Melay,
Ridwan. 1999. “Riau Lingga Dilema Kekuasaan dan Implikasi Perdagangan 1784-1824.” Tesis, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Mustamin, M. Hasyim, Makmur Haji Harun, dan Mohd Kasturi Nor. 2021. “Siri’ dan Pesse’: Pembentuk Nilai dan Identiti Melayu Bugis.” Journal of Human Development and Communication 10(1):15-23.
Netscher, E. 2002. Belanda di Johor dan Siak (1602 - 1865), Terj. Wan Galib. Siak: Bina Pustaka.
Nordin, Mardiana. 2021. “Pengukuhan Kuasa Melayu: Perkembangan Politik dan Pentadbiran Kesultanan Johor Sehingga Abad ke-18.” Jebat: Malaysian Journal of History, Politics and Strategic Studies 48(2):108-37.
Padilla, Amado M., dan William Perez. 2003. “Acculturation, Social Iden tity, and Social Cognition: A New Perspective.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 25(1):35-55.
Pelras, Christian. 1996. The Bugis. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
Rahmat, Syahrul. 2019. “Bugis di Kerajaan Melayu: Eksistensi Orang Bugis dalam Pemerintahan Kerajaan Johor-Riau-Lingga Pahang.” Perada 2(1):35-44.
_______. 2020. “Jejak Daeng di Tanah Melayu.” dalam Historisitas Cagar Budaya di Kepulauan Riau. Batusangkar: Balai Pelestarian Cagar Budaya (BPCB) Sumatra Barat.
_______. 2021. “Genealogis Melayu Bugis: Kajian Historiografi Terhadap Asal Usul Upu Daeng Lima Bersaudara dalam Sumber Sumber Melayu.” Perada 4(2):81- 96.
Rambe, Tappil, Pristi Suhendro Lukitoyo, Syahrul Nizar Saragih, dan Leylia Khairani. 2019. Sejarah Politik dan Kekuasaan. Medan: Yayasan Kita Menulis.
Sani, Amilda. 2020. “Diaspora Bugis dan Perkembangan Perdagangan Kopra di Sumatera pada Awal Abad XX.” Tamaddun: Jurnal Kebudayaan dan Sastra Islam 20(1):29-41.
Saripaini, dan Yusriadi. 2016. “Identitas Orang Bugis di Dabong, Kalimantan Barat.” Jurnal Khatulistiwa-Journal of Islamic Studies 6(2):170-82.
Sunarti, Linda, Raisye Soleh, dan Noor Fatia Lastika Sari. 2022. “The Bugis Diaspora in Malaysia: A Quest for Cultural Identity on Col lective Memories Through Social Media.” Cogent Arts & Humanities 9(1):1-16.
Susiyanto. 2020. Interaksi Antar Etnik dalam Kerangka Etnisitas: Teori, Konsep dan Implentasinya. Bengkulu: Zara Abadi.
Sutherland, Heather. 2001. “The Makassar Malays: Adaptation and Identity, c. 1660-1790.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 32(3):397- 421.
_______. 2017. “By The Numbers: Makassar’s Trade, Centralized Sta tistics and Local Realities.” Masyarakat Indonesia 39(2):289- 305.
Suwitha, I. Putu Gede. 2017. “Identity and Ethnicity of Bugis Community in Bali: An Historical Perspective.” Paramita: Historical Studies Journal 27(2):141-53.
Syawaludin, Mohammad. 2017. Teori Sosial Budaya dan Methodenstreit. Palembang: Noer Fikri.
Tamrin. 2015. “Perluasan Makna Kata Sapaan Daeng dalam Bahasa Makassar.” Sirok Bastra 3(1):45- 52
Umar. 2018. “Perantau Bugis dalam Narasi Sejarah: Sebuah Kritik Historiografi.” Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta.
Wati, Arena. 1973. Silsilah Melayu dan Bugis. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbitan Pustaka Antara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
By submitting the manuscript of papers/articles to Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, the authors are agreed to the following terms stated in copyright and license. Please also read our Publication Ethics dan Screening for Plagiarism.
Copyright
Authors who wish to publish and disseminate their papers with Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, shall agree to the publishing rights set by Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya. Authors understand that they shall assign publication right to Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya as part of the process upon acceptance for publication. The authors agreed that they will transfer certain copyrights to Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya (authors must transfer the copyright by using the downloaded form HERE). Consecutively, authors still retain the right to use and share their own published articles without written permission from Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, as long as attributed properly, that the articles are initially published at Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya.
Authors granted Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya these following rights; (1) the right to publish and provide the manuscripts in all forms and media for publication and dissemination, (2) the authority to enforce the rights in the manuscript, for example in the case of plagiarism or copyright infringement.
License
Works in Handep: Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya licensed under Creative Commons Attribution license. Users are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material under these terms; users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. Users may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses users or their usage.
